Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1944/1340
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChakravarty, Rupak-
dc.contributor.authorRandhawa, Sukhwinder-
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-19T10:42:21Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-19T10:42:21Z-
dc.date.issued2006-11-09-
dc.identifier.isbn81-902079-3-8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1944/1340-
dc.description.abstractSearch engines are about excitement, optimism, hope and enrichment. Search engines are also about despair and disappointment. A researcher while using search engines for resource discovery might have experienced one or the other sentiments. One may say that user satisfaction depends much upon the search strategies deployed by the user. But at the same time its also depends upon the quality of search engine used for information retrieval. Today, there are many search engines used for resource discovery. They display the results of the searches made in readily-comprehensible manner with lots of customization possibilities including refining and sorting. This paper is an attempt to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the three most used and popular search engines for academic resource discovery: Google Scholar, Scirus and Windows Live Academic.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherINFLIBNET Centreen_US
dc.subjectGoogle Scholaren_US
dc.subjectScirus; Windows Live Academicen_US
dc.subjectInvisible Weben_US
dc.subjectSearch Engineen_US
dc.titleAcademic Search Engines : Librarian’s Friend, Researcher’s Delighten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:PLANNER 2006

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
496-517.pdf388.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.